With the debate about people riding 'illegal' bikes in last year's race still rumbling on , I thought that it might be a good time to try to find out exactly what a Cyclocross Bike really is.
I own a classic Brian Rourke 531C cross bike , which I love , but it won't take a35mm tyre in the back - So I've been window shopping for something new.
The new Cotic X cyclocross bike caught my eye - Compliant Steel frame , choice of disc/canti mounts , and good tyre clearance - BUT - it's got a very compact MTB-style geometry , and with the detachable canti mounts removed , it starts to look a lot like a converted MTB.
I'd be very nervous about taking to the start line in September on a bike that looked so 'Ban-able' , yet it's listed as a cross bike by the manufacter !?!
So many bikes are appearing now , described as cross bikes , but with a second use built in (touring / commuting etc) that I'm really not sure where the line should be drawn.
Does anyone in the organisation have the time/patience to draw up a list of legal/illegal frames ? Or failing that , maybe a more precise set of design rules ?
P.S. If it's bone dry in late September , I'll probably run my Rourkie anyway , with a 32mm in the back - nothing rides like steel !